« Blog Home
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading ... Loading ...

There’s been loads of discussion lately about using Wordpress as a CMS platform. The recent Wordpress meetup held in Cape Town saw some discussion around the the topic. Adii presented a very compelling argument for the fact that Wordpress is essentially a database with different type of data which can be used in many different ways.

Some not in favour of labelling Wordpress as a CMS have presented equally compelling arguments. One of the main contenders people have spoken in favour of is Drupal which can be used to build much more than just a simple CMS site and has a great list of advanced features.

Joomla is also a hot contender in some camps with its own array of add-ons and extensions. I have so many debates in corridors and at web entrepreneur meetups about which platform is more preferable. Make no mistake I love Wordpress and think it can definitely provide a simple solution for most who want to publish a content managed website.

At a recent Wordpress meetup, Joey da Silva argued that content management systems go through a typical cycle where they start out light, fast and user friendly, and then as time passes become more and more bloated. Those who grow with the platform become the experts as it slowly slips out of reach of the average user. I never actually took a step back and looked at it this way before but it makes perfect sense.

We already have a few new entrants at the lowest end of the spectrum like CMS made simple. Locally there are not many contenders as far as I am aware, but Chisimba, which I wrote about earlier, looks like a promising platform coming out of the UWC Free Software Innovation Unit.

A CMS Comparison Tool

CMS Matrix is a website dedicated to providing information and comparisons between the available content management systems out there. You can check off a list of CMS applications and do an automatic comparison across all their features to see how they weigh up against each other. The comparisons are a little outdated as they are still using version 2.2 of Wordpress, which has been upgraded many times since.

Your comparisons need to be based on what you want to use the specific tool for, as your choice will definitely be influenced by the intended usage.

I found the comparison list a little intimidating as many of the categories went right over my head, so I’ve put together a little list of simple categories to use when assessing CMS’s.

So what makes a great open source Content Management System?

Ease of use?

Making any platform or system easy to use is one of the key objectives. Depending on who it’s being developed for, that may mean different things though. With the proliferation of open source content management systems making web publishing accessible to anyone with even basic PC skills means developers have to bear the low end PC user in mind when developing. ……

Installation

One of the major barriers to entry in my opinion is installation. Too many steps or too many complicated tasks involved in installing a cms on one’s domain and you cut out a huge group of users. This may not be that much of an issue for larger companies who have technical staff with the knowledge to do these installations. Installation is an issue of we’re talking about the average user wanting to set up a open source cms site.

Size

Web storage space, bandwidth and volume of files are also something to assess. I believe it depends largely on what the intended use is, for that matter each of the points could be seen differently depending on the use.

Security

Something which Wordpress for one has been criticised heavily for in the past and to date. We’ve seen a recent spate of website hackings taking place, many of them Wordpress sites. In general the hacks are spam related but there are more evil attacks being perpetrated where domains are completely overtaken and stolen. One such incident is David Airey’s site.

Out the box functionality

Does it do what you want on the fly, or do you have to hack and smack it into place? Once again, it depends on what you want your site to do. With most of the open source platforms, there are core list of out the box features, an extended list of community contributed plugins or modules, and the ability to integrate ones own applications and scripts. The power lies in customisation and the cost benefit equation between limit of customisation and the time and costs involved in implementing those custom features.

Functionality is a huge area, so this needs to be based on what you’re specifically trying to achieve. For example if you’re looking to build an enterprise level site for a huge corporation, Wordpress would definitely not suite your needs and if you’re wanting to create a blogging platform, Joomla is a little clunky.

SEO

Search engine rankings are elusive to most and gaining an advantage in this area is pursued in a myriad ways, some ethical and some not so ethical. SEO tools, tricks and plugins flood the web to the point that we can no longer tell whether they have effect or not without some rigorous testing. So naturally when choosing an open source CMS SEO is a key factor.

Community and Social Networking

It has become a staple of the web, having features which extend mere web pages into communal spaces where people can interact, share, collaborate and be more human. Wikis, blogs, forums, commenting, chatting, file sharing, video, instant messaging and the rest work together towards turning a web page into a highly engaging space of experience, interaction and learning.

I found a few sites attempting to list and compare the latest CMS systems:

 

What’s your take on open source CMS’s?

I’ve been toying with the idea of getting a few meetups going around the topic of open source CMS’s instead of just focusing only on Wordpress. For starters I’d like to hear from you:

  • What you think makes a CMS
  • What your favourites are
  • How they should be judged
  • If you think Open CMS Camps are a good idea



Related Posts
  • None

7 Responses to “The great open source CMS debate”

It goes without saying that the tool depends on the function. That said, I think that Drupal is awesome and can pretty easily be used to meet most functions. It is FAR more versatile than Wordpress - Drupal is a true CMS system.

Crucially, because it has such an active user community Drupal is:
- Easy to extend (think of a feature and someone has already developed and shared it)
- Very well documented

When I first installed Drupal I found it pretty intimidating (not as simple as Wordpress), but if you get stuck in it’s actually very easy.

If you are interested in CMS – i.e. anything much more than a blog or something will contributing users – then I recommend looking into Drupal.

(Report abuse)

Al on June 26th, 2008 at 12:14 pm

Wordpress is a default web site. You can get a brief from a client to have a website with no blog functionality and still take a theme, a few add-ons, get your head around WP templates and presto!
IMH-dabbling-O, Drupal has a steeper learning curve and compared to WP is clunky. Joomla creates unnecessary pages (eg: click here to go to a page of links, so that you can leave the site). Makes sense when building a content tree, but not for users.

(Report abuse)

derek on June 27th, 2008 at 12:16 pm

There are a few other dimensions to the OS CMS debate in general, and Drupal in particular:

- depth of local skills (see the Shuttleworth interview at searchcio.co.za)
- lack of any real quality grading system for add-ons (and attendant poor documentation)
- perhaps most troubling, the periodic “version quakes” that appear to have become a persistent pattern

Drupal is currently experiencing this last (again) with the 5.7 release being the most widely used, but the latest version (currently 6.2) offering some exciting features.

The bulk of add-on themes & modules haven’t quite caught up with the newest release, and this means that you have to choose between a stable legacy core, richly extended, but no longer maintained, or a stable but still narrowly used new core which will take some time to become the new standard.

This means that there is a built-in evolutionary shakeout (not necessarily a bad thing) since many modules never move ahead to embrace new versions.

It also means that deciding on the foundation for projects that need to be done today is not an easy call, especially since many architectural and functional issues were addressed in the move to the new version. Catch-22 drupal style ;)

(Report abuse)

Ant on June 27th, 2008 at 4:27 pm

[…] The great open source CMS debate […]

(Report abuse)


I started off with Xoops, then Mambo and finally capped it off with Joomla! I found Joomla quite good, it made me wanna learn PHP and for a while I did hack up my Joomla installations extensively.

At the end, I ditched Joomla and found Umbraco. Now Umbraco is quite tight but the lack of documentation is enough to drive one insane.

At the moment my team and I are just building our up comming site from the ground up. We decided to build from the ground because of control issues.

Had bad experiences with messed up Joomla installations after patch ups SimpleMachines/PHPBB and other addons..

As far as blog systems go, I think WP is ok, I used B-Evolution a whole lot, as well as Subtext and .Net Blogengine. So I think the masses are spoilt for choice.

(Report abuse)

Khathutshelo on June 30th, 2008 at 1:12 pm

Funny how when people say Open Source everyone thinks of Linux et al.

What about Open Source DotNetNuke? Or even open source .net newcomer Umbraco?

(Report abuse)

Steve Mathew on July 1st, 2008 at 10:57 pm

joomla’s good, easi2 insall, easy to use, huge online community prolly the biggest for open source cms - so lotsa help, smart and useful addons, modules etc. duznt look to bad also, drupal looks a bit noob. chisimba is crap.

(Report abuse)

chi on September 26th, 2008 at 10:34 pm

Leave a Reply

All comments must be approved by our editors, click here to read the editorial guidelines for comments. Please allow some time for our editors to approve your comment after posting.

Send me the Thought Leader daily newsletter

profile
Nur Ahmad Furlong - nomad-one is a designer on & offline, newbie social entrepreneur, a self confessed Wordpress nut, blogger, brand strategist and a social media traveler. He has worked in the communications industry since 1998 and currently focuses on ethically sound products & services which have a positive impact on society and the environment. He believes in the �Do No Harm� principle, and that the Brand of the future is the one that manages to improve society in general while making a profit. Nur's company, Colab Communications is an ethically focused communications agency which aims to develop conversations for a positive society.
Tell a Friend Technorati RSS
more posts
I have had the pleasure of spending some time on the VeloCITI business incubation programme with Brett Simpson of Breadbin Interactive, one of the ent...
Get your already bombarded minds ready for an attack of digital screens which will hunt you down and force their products on you. Advertisers are latc...
Content Management systems are all the rave at the moment with so many people publishing online. We all have our preferences and it's no secret where ...
Ok, first off, this post is not meant to stoke the flames of controversy, though it is a sensitive topic, that being of race. I was notified through g...
If you don't know what Wordpress is yet, just take a look around at the Tech Leader platform and see Wordpress in full swing. Tech Leader runs on the ...
latest activity
Blog Statistics
Total reads 1657
Total comments 29
Nur Ahmad's tags
advertisement
<
    Mail & Guardian Online Headlines
  • National
  • Business
  • Africa
  • World
  • Sport
All material copyright of the author, or the Mail & Guardian, unless otherwise specified
Author Login
Afrigator